THOMSON v. THOMAS

No. 196.

156 S.E.2d 850 (1967)

271 N.C. 450

Gladys M. THOMSON v. Harry Doyle THOMAS, Sr., and Harry Doyle Thomas, Jr., minor, by his Guardian Ad Litem Harry Doyle Thomas, Sr., and Mrs. Harry Doyle Thomas, Sr.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 27, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. G. Smith, Wilmington, for defendant appellants.

Stevens, Burgwin, McGhee & Ryals, by Karl W. McGhee and Ellis L. Aycock, Wilmington, for plaintiff appellee.


PER CURIAM.

Defendants Harry Doyle Thomas, Sr., and Mrs. Harry Doyle Thomas, Sr., assign as error the denial of their motion for judgment of compulsory nonsuit at the close of plaintiff's evidence, on the ground, inter alia, that "there was not sufficient evidence of the agency of Thomas, Jr., under the family purpose doctrine as applied in North Carolina upon which the jury could have found that the car involved in this accident was a `family purpose' vehicle...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases