IN RE SPINKS

Docket No. 2844.

253 Cal.App.2d 748 (1967)

61 Cal. Rptr. 743

In re WILLIAM SPINKS on Habeas Corpus.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

August 21, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward T. Butler, City Attorney, Robert A. Fitch and Clayton L. Miller, Deputy City Attorneys, for Appellant.

Peter Clarke for Respondent.


COUGHLIN, J.

By petition for writ of habeas corpus, William Spinks alleged he was unlawfully imprisoned in the San Diego County jail; was a chronic alcoholic sentenced to that jail for 180 days, less one day suspended, for violation of Penal Code, section 647, subdivision (f); and this sentence violated the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution because his "acts were compulsive as symptomatic of his disease and that treatment of such acts as criminal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases