PENNINGTON v. DUDLEY

No. 40465.

10 Ohio St. 2d 90 (1967)

PENNINGTON, APPELLEE, v. DUDLEY, ADMR., BUREAU OF UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION, ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 19, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Clayman, Jaffy & Taylor and Mr. Stewart R. Jaffy, for appellee.

Messrs. Porter, Stanley, Treffinger & Platt, Mr. James J. Hughes, Jr., Mr. William B. Saxbe, attorney general, Mr. C. Richard Gregg and Mr. Anthony R. Kidd, for appellants.


TAFT, C. J.

As its only reasons for reversing the decision of the Board of Review, the judgment entry of the Common Pleas Court states generally that the board's decision is "unlawful, unreasonable and against the manifest weight of the evidence." Especially since this court is not required to and does not generally weigh evidence, it is reasonably arguable that this judgment entry might interfere with our consideration of the legal questions argued by the parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases