1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 355 F.2d
  5. 355 F.2d 641 (1966)
 

APPLICATION OF PYE

Patent Appeal No. 7513.

355 F.2d 641 (1966)

Application of David J. PYE and Donald K. Peterson.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

February 10, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harness, Dickey & Pierce, Neal A. Waldrop, Detroit, Mich., Theodore Post, Midland, Mich., for appellants.

Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D. C. (Fred W. Sherling, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, SMITH and ALMOND, Judges.

ALMOND, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claim 11 in appellants' application1 entitled "Soap Composition." One claim was allowed by the board.

The appealed claim reads as follows:

11. A lubricious composition for the skin which consists essentially of a major proportion of ingredients selected from the group consisting of non-soap anionic and non-ionic synthetic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases