Per Curiam.
The proof is sufficient to sustain the trial court's finding that the highest and best use of the property before the appropriation was for business purposes and to sustain, also, the court's evaluation thereof at 42 cents per square foot. Claimant's expert considered that the taking of 105,600 square feet from the tract of 362,000 square feet left the remainder of 256,400 square feet inadequate for the shopping center use contemplated for the entire...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.