1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 33 Wis.2d
  5. 33 Wis.2d 64 (1966)
 

ESTATE OF KESKE v. KESKE

33 Wis.2d 64 (1966)

ESTATE OF KESKE: KASTENMEIER, Appellant, v. KESKE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 29, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Lueck & Skupniewitz of Beaver Dam, and oral argument by A. W. Lueck.

For the respondent there was a brief by Bruce R. Rasmussen of Beaver Dam, attorney, and Williams, Williams & Meyer and Thomas S. Williams, all of Oshkosh, of counsel, and oral argument by Thomas S. Williams.

GORDON, J.

The order which is before us is not an appealable one, and therefore this appeal must be dismissed. Even though this issue was not raised by the parties, it is our responsibility to examine the question of appealability on our own motion. Dombrowski v. Tomasino (1964), 24 Wis.2d 16, 127 N.W.2d 786; Lentz v. Northwestern National Casualty Co. (1963), 19 Wis.2d 569,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases