BRYANT v. RUSSELL

No. 113.

146 S.E.2d 813 (1966)

266 N.C. 629

Yvonne BRYANT v. Marjorie Marie RUSSELL and Paul Howard Russell.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 2, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kennedy W. Ward, New Bern, for plaintiff appellant.

Barden, Stith, McCotter & Sugg, New Bern, for defendant appellees.


PER CURIAM.

In Ingram v. McCuiston, 261 N.C. 392, 134 S.E.2d 705, this Court said: "To be competent a hypothetical question may include only facts which are already in evidence or those which the jury might logically infer therefrom." See also: Jackson v. Stancil, 253 N.C. 291, 303, 116 S.E.2d 817

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases