1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 143 N.W.2d
  5. 143 N.W.2d 813 (1966)
 

MANGOLD MIDWEST CO. v. VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD

No. 39824.

143 N.W.2d 813 (1966)

MANGOLD MIDWEST CO. et al., Appellants, v. VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Rehearing Denied April 4, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Feinberg, Mirviss, Meyers, Schumacher & Malmon, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Howard, Peterson, LeFevere, Lefler & Hamilton, Minneapolis, for respondent.

OPINION

FRANK T. GALLAGHER, C.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court declaring Ordinance No. 11.10 of the Village of Richfield to be a valid and enforceable ordinance.

Plaintiffs in this case, Mangold Midwest Company, United Distributors of Minnesota, Inc., and A. M. Servicing Corporation of Raytown, operate a large retail department store at 7701 Nicollet Avenue South in the village of Richfield. The store has been operating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases