SMITH v. STATE

[No. 460, September Term, 1964.]

242 Md. 712 (1966)

219 A.2d 16

SMITH v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided April 28, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Solomon Reddick for appellant.

Carville M. Downes, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General and Charles E. Moylan, Jr., State's Attorney for Baltimore City, on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before PRESCOTT, C.J., and HAMMOND, HORNEY, MARBURY and BARNES, JJ.


PER CURIAM:

Carl Henry Smith appeals his conviction of possession and control of narcotics, relying on the defenses of entrapment, that he was a mere conduit for an informer, that he was deprived of the right of cross-examination of the informer because the State did not call him as its witness, and deprived of the benefit of the informer's testimony when he (the appellant) called him and the informer took the fifth amendment.

A Baltimore City police officer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases