1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 365 F.2d
  5. 365 F.2d 588 (1966)
 

CROWN TAR AND CHEMICAL WORKS, INC. v. N. L. R. B.

No. 8372.

365 F.2d 588 (1966)

CROWN TAR AND CHEMICAL WORKS, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

August 26, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Pfeiffer, Denver, Colo. (Isaacson, Rosenbaum, Goldberg & Miller, Denver, Colo., on the brief), for petitioner.

Melvin H. Reifin, Attorney, NLRB (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Solomon I. Hirsch, Attorney, NLRB, on the brief), for respondent.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and JONES and HICKEY, Circuit Judges.

JONES, Circuit Judge.

The management of the Petitioner, Crown Tar and Chemical Works, Inc., had reason to believe and did believe that an effort would be made at an early date to effect a union organization of its employees. For the purpose of thwarting such effort, if possible, the management of Crown determined that it would give its employees a pay increase of fifteen cents an hour. This decision was made in May, 1964.1 Around the middle...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases