1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 383 U.S.
  5. 383 U.S. 569 (1966)
 

MALAT v. RIDDELL

No. 487.

383 U.S. 569 (1966)

MALAT ET UX. v. RIDDELL, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 21, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George T. Altman argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners.

Jack S. Levin argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, Melva M. Graney and Carolyn R. Just.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner1 was a participant in a joint venture which acquired a 45-acre parcel of land, the intended use for which is somewhat in dispute. Petitioner contends that the venturers' intention was to develop and operate an apartment project on the land; the respondent's position is that there was a "dual purpose" of developing the property for rental purposes or selling, whichever proved...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases