1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 242 Cal.App.2d
  5. 242 Cal.App.2d 705 (1966)
 

PRICE v. PRICE

Docket No. 612.

242 Cal.App.2d 705 (1966)

51 Cal. Rptr. 699

SUSAN DARLENE PRICE, a Minor, etc., et al., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ROY PRICE, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

June 6, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Di Giorgio, Davis & Nairn, Anthony J. Klein and V.P. Di Giorgio for Plaintiff and Appellant.

King, Eyherabide, Cooney & Owen and Robert E. King for Defendant and Respondent.

CONLEY, P.J.

The answer to the following question must control the outcome of this appeal: does the nunc pro tunc date of an interlocutory divorce decree, or the actual calendar date on which it is entered, control the application of the conclusive presumption that a child born in wedlock is the issue of the husband?

Plaintiff, born March 25, 1962, sued the defendant, Roy Price, through her guardian ad litem, Vay Vawter (who is also her mother...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases