GARLICK v. VITALE


25 A.D.2d 917 (1966)

Edward E. Garlick et al., Appellants, v. Anthony Vitale, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

May 20, 1966


REYNOLDS, J.

Furthermore, there is no necessary inconsistency in the jury's verdict of "no compensation in order" for the plaintiff husband. The jury could properly find that plaintiff did not sustain the burden of proving that any actual damages or expenses were attributable to the accident. (See Leonard v. Voltz, 190 App. Div. 748, affd. 232 N.Y. 575.)

Judgment affirmed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases