GELENCSER v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.


31 Wis.2d 62 (1966)

GELENCSER, Respondent, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 10, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant Industrial Commission there was a brief by Arnold J. Spencer, chief counsel of the unemployment compensation division, and Ralph E. Kline of Madison.

For the appellant Board of Regents of State Colleges the cause was argued by Charles A. Bleck, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Julius Gelencser of Middletown, New York, in pro. per.


HALLOWS, J.

The material facts are not in dispute and the sole question is a legal one of construction of the exclusionary language of the Unemployment Compensation Act. In defining employment under the act as it applies to a governmental unit, sec. 108.02 (5) (f) 4, Stats., provides that the term shall not include the employment of any person as a teacher in an educational institution supported wholly or substantially from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases