Motion dismissed, with $10 costs and necessary printing disbursements, upon the ground that the determination sought to be reviewed involves a pure question of discretion of the type not reviewable by the Court of Appeals (Miranda v. City of New York,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ROSENBERG v. CARUTH
18 N.Y.2d 910 (1966)
Abe Rosenberg et al., Respondents, v. Barry M. Caruth et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents. In the Matter of The Estate of Pauline Rosenberg, Deceased. Sylvia Caruth, as Administratrix, Appellant; Abe Rosenberg et al., Respondents.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted November 28, 1966.
Decided November 29, 1966.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Barry M. Caruth, pro se, for motion.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.