MATTER OF KNIFFEN v. WINSLOW


25 A.D.2d 902 (1966)

In the Matter of the Claim of Harry Kniffen, Respondent, v. Frances D. Winslow et al., Appellants, and Alfred Parks et al., Respondents. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

May 3, 1966


GIBSON, P. J.

The medical evidence subsequent to the 1961 incident of pain consists of medical reports only. All of the parties were, of course, afforded the opportunity, specifically on one occasion, to require testimony by the physicians so reporting, but chose not to do so and appear content to submit the appeal upon a record constituted by medical reports and lay testimony. Asked whether there was "anything in particular", other than the pain to which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases