1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 17 N.Y.2d
  5. 17 N.Y.2d 906 (1966)
 

MICHL v. SHANKLIN

17 N.Y.2d 906 (1966)

H. Edward Michl, as a Taxpayer of the County of Schenectady, Respondent-Appellant, v. Vanderbogert Shanklin et al., Appellants-Respondents, and George V. Palmer et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided June 9, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Albert De Matteo, County Attorney (Irving Galt of counsel), for appellants-respondents.

Harold E. Blodgett, Samuel P. Frankel and John J. Ciervo for respondent-appellant.

George V. Palmer and Guy A. Graves, intervenors-respondents in person.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING.

On appeal by plaintiff: Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion at Special Term.

On appeal by defendants: Order of Appellate Division modified, without costs, by reversing so much thereof as directs summary judgment in favor of plaintiff and by directing entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants. The County of Schenectady has acted expeditiously, in order to correct the conceded present malapportionment, by adopting a new County...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases