1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 244 Cal.App.2d
  5. 244 Cal.App.2d 666 (1966)
 

CITIZENS SUBURBAN CO. v. ROSEMONT DEV. CO., INC.

Docket No. 11108.

244 Cal.App.2d 666 (1966)

53 Cal. Rptr. 551

CITIZENS SUBURBAN COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROSEMONT DEVELOPMENT CO., INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants; SACRAMENTO COUNTY WATER AGENCY, Intervener and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

September 7, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris M. Grupp for Defendants and Appellants.

Orrick, Dahlquist, Herrington & Sutcliffe, Christopher M. Jenks and Richard J. Lucas for Plaintiff and Respondent.

John B. Heinrich, County Counsel, for Intervener and Respondent.

FRIEDMAN, J.

Plaintiff, a water company, seeks specific performance of a service agreement under which it claims the exclusive right to furnish water to the successive "units" of a subdivision development. The subdividers appeal from an adverse judgment.

[1] The Rosemont subdivision is situated in the unincorporated area of Sacramento County just south of Highway 50. Owner of the land was Wunderlich...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases