STOCKMAN v. MARKS POLARIZED CORP.


25 A.D.2d 883 (1966)

Murray Stockman et al., Respondents, v. Marks Polarized Corporation et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 23, 1966


Order reversed, without costs, and motion remitted to the Special Term for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

In our opinion, there is no basis in the record for holding that the failure of Mrs. Marks to appear for examination was that willful failure contemplated by the statute; and defendants' answer should not have been struck out, even on condition (Livingstone v. Mayes, 23 A.D.2d 814; Nomako v. Ashton...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases