EDGAR v. WORKMEN'S COMP. APP. BD., NAVAJO FREIGHT LINES

Docket No. 30856.

246 Cal.App.2d 660 (1966)

56 Cal. Rptr. 37

DUANE EDGAR, Petitioner, v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, NAVAJO FREIGHT LINES et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

November 28, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven Roseman for Petitioner.

Everett A. Corten, Edward A. Sarkisian, Grogan & Hogan and Maurice R. Hogan, Jr., for Respondents.


McCOY, J. pro tem.*

Petitioner (applicant) seeks review and annulment of an award of workmen's compensation. He contends: (1) that he was denied procedural due process because of the referee's refusal to admit certain evidence; and (2) that the evidence refused, being evidence of medical treatment by physicians furnished by respondents (employer and insurer), compels a finding that applicant was entitled to continuing

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases