1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 26 A.D.2d
  5. 26 A.D.2d 871 (1966)
 

MATTER OF POPPER v. BD. OF REGENTS OF THE UNIV. OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

26 A.D.2d 871 (1966)

In the Matter of Felix Popper, Petitioner, v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

October 21, 1966

REYNOLDS, J.

Contrary to petitioner's contention his actions clearly constituted unprofessional conduct (Matter of Bell v. Board of Regents, 295 N.Y. 101, 111). We find no significance in the fact that such conduct by chiropodists, pharmacists or optometrists would not be unprofessional. Nor can we agree that the specific charge of fee splitting has not been established. While section 44 (subd 2 [a], par. [2]) of the Commissioners Regulations ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases