Appellants deny occupational relationship; and their medical experts were of opinion that the condition was not related to the occupation. The board was, of course, entitled to reject their conclusions and to accept, as it did, that of claimant's expert who testified that, "It was my opinion with reasonable medical certainty, and with my knowledge, that the work did precipitate this [condition]." This physician
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF MOSHER v. RUPPERT
26 A.D.2d 862 (1966)
In the Matter of the Claim of Arthur Mosher, Respondent v. Jacob Ruppert et al., Appellants. Workmen Compensation Board, Respondent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 20, 1966
October 20, 1966
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.