1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 183 So.2d
  5. 183 So.2d 696 (1966)
 

IN RE ESTATE OF PITAKOS

No. 6092.

183 So.2d 696 (1966)

In re ESTATE of Nicholas S. PITAKOS, Deceased. Charles M. MICHEL, Dick Michel, William Michel and Jack Michel, Appellants, v. Robert PITAKOS, Ioanna Monoly, George Pitakos and Maria Staveri, William L. Kimball, Esq., Attorney for Administrator C.T.A. of the Estate of Nicholas S. Pitakos, Deceased, and Bruce Beihl, Esq., Guardian Ad Litem for the Wards, Sandra Lee Pitakos, Stanley Jerome Pitakos and Marilyn Louise Pitakos, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

March 4, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert G. Blalock, of Knowles, Knowles & Mann, Bradenton, for appellants.

Dewey A. Dye, Sr., and A. Lamar Matthews, Jr., of Dye, Dye & Smith, Bradenton, for appellees.

Bruce Beihl, Bradenton, guardian ad litem for minor appellees.

LILES, Judge.

Appellants bring this appeal from an order of the probate court construing the provisions of the will of Nicholas S. Pitakos. The basic conflict is between appellant Charles M. Michel and the residuary legatees under the will. The will provision giving rise to this conflict reads as follows:

"ITEM THREE: I have previously made arrangements with my deceased wife's Nephew, CHARLES M. MICHEL, 2449 Bushwik Drive, Dayton, Ohio, whereby he has agreed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases