Claimant, who had shortly become stuporous, testified that he had no recollection of the incident, the proof of which was elicited from his helper, whose testimony is attacked by appellants as incredible, principally because claimant's wife said that the helper did not tell her of the accident at the time or until some six weeks later. Thus there was involved a question of credibility which the board, under its well-established powers, was...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
