1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 265 F.Supp.
  5. 265 F.Supp. 588 (1966)
 

HIGLEY v. BRENNER

Civ. A. No. 1193-65.

265 F.Supp. 588 (1966)

Rolland C. HIGLEY, Plaintiff, v. Edward J. BRENNER, Commissioner of Patents, Defendant.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

December 9, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

S. Tom Morris, Amarillo, Tex., and Keith Misegades, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Clarence W. Moore, Sol., Fred W. Sherling, Washington, D. C., for defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

McGUIRE, District Judge.

This action was brought pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 145 after the claims in plaintiff's application for Letters Patent of September 28, 1961, serial number 142,456, were rejected by the Patent Office as anticipated by the prior art (35 U.S.C. § 102) and as obvious to a person skilled in the art (35 U.S.C. § 103).

At issue in this case are claims numbered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases