1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Kan.
  4. 196 Kan.
  5. 196 Kan. 654 (1966)
 

URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY v. TATE

No. 44,392

196 Kan. 654 (1966)

414 P.2d 28

THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF THE WICHITA, KANSAS, METROPOLITAN AREA, Appellant, v. ELIZABETH TATE, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed May 7, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald H. Rogg, of Wichita, argued the cause, and John R. Blair, Don Matlack and Richard V. Foote, all of Wichita, were with him on the brief for the appellant.

Russell Schultz, of Wichita, argued the cause, and Larry Kirby, also of Wichita, was with him on the brief for the appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

SCHROEDER, J.:

This is an appeal in a condemnation action.

The underlying question is whether the trial court erred in giving an instruction to the jury which the appellant alleges to be a directed verdict for the landowner.

In the year 1958 the Urban Renewal Agency of the Wichita, Kansas, Metropolitan Area (appellant) by and through its agents and employees, informed Elizabeth Tate (appellee), the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases