1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 261 F.Supp.
  5. 261 F.Supp. 587 (1966)
 

MONTECATINI SOCIETÁ GENERALE v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO.

Civ. No. 16526.

261 F.Supp. 587 (1966)

MONTECATINI SOCIETÁ GENERALE per L'INDUSTRIA MINERARIA e CHIMICA v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY and National Plastic Products Company.

United States District Court D. Maryland.

December 16, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward S. Irons, Irons, Birch, Swindler & McKie, Cox, Langford & Brown, Washington, D. C., and Benjamin C. Howard, Miles & Stockbridge, Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff.

Thomas F. Reddy, Jr., Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Taylor & Adams, New York City, J. Martin McDonough and Piper & Marbury, Baltimore, Md., for defendants.

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

This case is before the Court on defendants' motion to add Enjay Chemical Company, a Delaware corporation (Enjay), as a party defendant pursuant to Rule 25(c), F.R.Civ.P., which provides:

"Rule 25. Substitution of Parties "(c) Transfer of Interest. In case of any transfer of interest, the action may be continued by or against the original party, unless the court upon motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases