DONAHUE v. ZIV TELEVISION PROGRAMS, INC.

Docket No. 28569.

245 Cal.App.2d 593 (1966)

54 Cal. Rptr. 130

FRANK DONAHUE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ZIV TELEVISION PROGRAMS, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

October 14, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cantillon & Cantillon and James P. Cantillon, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Trippet, Yoakum & Ballantyne, and F.B. Yoakum, Jr., for Defendants and Appellants.


KAUS, J.

After a jury had awarded plaintiffs a verdict in the sum of $250,000, the exact amount of their prayer, the trial court granted defendants' motions for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial. The latter order was based on the insufficiency of the evidence. Plaintiffs appealed from the judgment and the order. Defendants cross-appealed. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3(a).)

The theory of plaintiffs' case was this: before and during the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases