PER CURIAM.
We have examined the record, have read the briefs and heard oral argument. There is sufficient evidence to sustain the Chancellor's findings, and appellant has failed clearly to demonstrate error. Accordingly, the decree appealed from is affirmed.
RAWLS, C.J., and SACK, J., concur.
JOHNSON, J., dissents.
I cannot agree with the Per Curiam opinion adopted...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.