HAMILTON v. WRANG


221 A.2d 605 (1966)

Arthur HAMILTON and Dolores Hamilton, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. Alan M. WRANG, Defendant Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

June 30, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ralph F. Keil and Carl Goldstein, of Keil & Keil, Wilmington, for appellants.

Warren B. Burt, of Prickett & Prickett, Wilmington, for appellee.

WOLCOTT, C. J., and CAREY and HERRMANN, JJ., sitting.


WOLCOTT, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs in a personal injury and property damage action from a judgment in their favor entered on a jury's verdict. They seek a reversal and the award of a new trial on the grounds that the verdict was a nullity because it failed to award damages to the plaintiffs in a stated amount; because their motion for a new trial was denied by the trial judge on the ground that failure to object to the form of the verdict...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases