1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 242 Or.
  5. 242 Or. 572 (1966)
 

RACING COMMISSION v. MULTNOMAH KENNEL CLUB

242 Or. 572 (1966)

411 P.2d 63

OREGON RACING COMMISSION ET AL v. MULTNOMAH KENNEL CLUB

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed February 16, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott M. Kelley, Special Assistant Attorney General, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General.

Lamar Tooze, Sr., Portland, and Robert E. Thompson, Beaverton, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Tooze, Powers, Kerr, Tooze & Peterson, and Thompson & Adams.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and SLOAN, GOODWIN, HOLMAN and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

LUSK, J.

The defendant, Multnomah Kennel Club, has, since 1933, conducted greyhound racing meets as a licensee of the Oregon Racing Commission. As authorized by statute, pari-mutuel betting is engaged in at these meets. A brief description of the system of betting may be found in City of Portland v. Duntley, 185 Or. 365, 375-376, 203 P.2d 640. This suit was brought by the State of Oregon, through the Commission and the State Land Board, to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases