LAYMAN v. HALL OMAR BKG. CO. ET AL.

No. 20,164.

138 Ind. App. 673 (1966)

213 N.E.2d 726

LAYMAN v. HALL OMAR BAKING COMPANY ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

Rehearing denied April 18, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Verl G. Miller and Berry, Kincade & Miller, of Terre Haute, and Branigin, DeMoss & Jones, of Franklin, for appellant.

John R. Hiner, Grace M. Curry and Bingham, Summers & Spilman, of Indianapolis, and James B. Young and Pogue & Young, of Franklin, for appellee.


WICKENS, J.

A suit to recover damages because of personal injuries was instituted by plaintiff-appellant. At the conclusion of the plaintiff's evidence the trial court sustained a motion for a directed verdict for defendant-appellee.

Here appellant by a motion for new trial alleges the verdict is contrary to law and that the trial court erred in instructing the jury to find for defendants.

This court is properly said to have approved the theory that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases