1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 242 Or.
  5. 242 Or. 566 (1966)
 

CHARCO, INC. v. COHN

242 Or. 566 (1966)

411 P.2d 264

CHARCO, INC. v. COHN

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed February 16, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George M. Joseph, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, Portland.

Philip A. Levin, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Pozzi, Levin & Wilson, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, GOODWIN, DENECKE, HOLMAN and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

McALLISTER, C.J.

This case is a sequel to Clark v. Auto Wholesale Co., Inc., 237 Or. 446, 391 P.2d 754 (1964). The defendant in that case, Auto Wholesale, is the plaintiff in this case, its name in the interim having been changed to Charco, Inc.

A brief resume of the facts and holding in the Clark case is necessary to an understanding of the issues in this case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases