1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 356 F.2d
  5. 356 F.2d 442 (1966)
 

TECHNOGRAPH PRINTED CIRCUITS, LTD. v. METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC.

Nos. 15020, 15021, 15023, 15024.

356 F.2d 442 (1966)

TECHNOGRAPH PRINTED CIRCUITS, LTD., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. TECHNOGRAPH PRINTED CIRCUITS, LTD., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENERAL TELEPHONE & ELECTRONICS CORPORATION and Automatic Electric Company, Defendants-Appellees. TECHNOGRAPH PRINTED CIRCUITS, LTD., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WEBCOR, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. TECHNOGRAPH PRINTED CIRCUITS, LTD., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CRONAME, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.

Rehearing Denied March 22, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter J. Blenko, Pittsburgh, Pa., Jerome F. Fallon, Chicago, Ill., Walter J. Blenko, Jr., Paul A. Beck, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiffs-appellants, M. Victor Leventritt, New York City, of counsel.

Theodore W. Anderson, Arthur A. Olson, Victor Myer, Charles M. Carter, Chicago, Ill., for Automatic Electric Co., defendant-appellee.

Lawrence W. Brugman, Warren C. Horton, Chicago, Ill., for Croname, Inc., defendant-appellee.

Watson D. Harbaugh, Evanston, Ill., for Webcor, Inc., defendant-appellee, Harbaugh, Rummler & Snow, Evanston, Ill., of counsel.

Ralph B. Stewart, Washington, D. C., William D. McFarland, Chicago, Ill., Kemon, Palmer, Stewart & Estabrook, Washington, D. C., for Methode Electronics, Inc., defendant-appellee, Spray, Price, Hough & Cushman, Chicago, Ill., of counsel.

Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and KNOCH and KILEY, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing Denied in Nos. 15021, 15023 March 22, 1966.

HASTINGS, Chief Judge.

These are parallel cases filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois by plaintiffs charging infringement of Eisler patents No. 2,441,960 (No. 960), Reissue No. 24,165 (No. 165) and No. 2,706,697 (No. 697).

The Eisler patents in suit are generally concerned with methods of producing so-called "printed circuits" for use in the manufacture...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases