Order affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the holding at Special Term that defendant sustained no damage by virtue of the issuance of the preliminary injunction. We find additionally that, had the injunction not been issued, defendant (a landlord) would not necessarily have sooner regained possession of the property involved. Had it commenced a summary proceeding against its tenant (the plaintiff), such proceeding might well have been consolidated with this action...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.