GRAHAM v. GRAHAM


244 Or. 535 (1966)

419 P.2d 419

GRAHAM v. GRAHAM

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed October 26, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R.W. Kitson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Rader & Kitson, Portland.

Alan R. Jack, Oregon City, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Jack, Goodwin & Anicker, Oregon City.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, DENECKE and HOLMAN, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff brought this suit for a divorce. The trial court denied the divorce and the plaintiff appeals.

The trial court was of the opinion that, although the conduct of neither party was conducive to complete harmony, the evidence failed to disclose conduct which made the plaintiff's life burdensome so that the parties could no longer maintain the marital status.

It would...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases