DURNFORD v. WORDEN


242 Or. 536 (1966)

410 P.2d 1020

DURNFORD v. WORDEN

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed February 9, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederic P. Roehr, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Vergeer & Samuels, Portland.

C.X. Bollenback, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Carl Francis, Dayton.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, DENECKE, HOLMAN, and SCHWAB, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

HOLMAN, J.

Plaintiff brought an action for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident between vehicles driven by plaintiff and defendant. Upon trial the jury returned a verdict for defendant. Plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial which was granted by the trial court. Defendant has appealed from the order granting a new trial.

The two vehicles were traveling in opposite directions on a graveled county road. They met on a sharp...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases