STATE v. GRIFFITH


244 Or. 520 (1966)

419 P.2d 1

STATE OF OREGON v. DARYL L. GRIFFITH

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed October 19, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard R. Lonergan, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Fred Jensen, Portland.

Jacob B. Tanzer, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, and George M. Joseph, Deputy District Attorney, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and SLOAN, GOODWIN, HOLMAN and LUSK, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

HOLMAN, J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of assault with a dangerous weapon and appealed from the resultant judgment of imprisonment.

1-3. Defendant's sole ground of appeal is that he was inadequately represented by counsel, thus depriving him of a fair trial and due process under § 1 of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. He purported to set out by affidavit the respects in which counsel was inadequate. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases