The plaintiff was an employee of J. C. Bradley & Son and was injured while performing work for his employer pursuant to a subcontract with the defendant. The plaintiff first argues that the following statement made by counsel for the defendant in the course of selecting a jury was so prejudicial as to require reversal of the judgment: "We all know that an employee injured in the course of his employment is entitled to Workmen's compensation...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
