1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 239 Cal.App.2d
  5. 239 Cal.App.2d 516 (1966)
 

FORSTNER v. CITY AND CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO

Docket No. 22477.

239 Cal.App.2d 516 (1966)

48 Cal. Rptr. 805

JAMES A. FORSTNER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

January 21, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas M. O'Connor, City Attorney, and Bernard J. Ward, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Appellants.

Goldstein, Kopp & Skinner, Kopp & Skinner, Quentin L. Kopp and Vivian Hannawalt for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

SHOEMAKER, P.J.

Plaintiffs, employed as Class 8410 probation officers by the City and County of San Francisco (hereafter referred to as the "city"), brought this proceeding in mandamus to compel the city, its civil service commission, its board of supervisors and the individual members of both bodies, to reclassify plaintiffs' positions so as to entitle them to the higher rate of compensation as established for Class T-56 probation officers, and to pay plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases