1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 411 P.2d
  5. 411 P.2d 332 (1966)
 

HALE v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER

No. 21514.

411 P.2d 332 (1966)

Charles F. HALE and William D. Cox, individually, and as a co-partnership doing business as Surplus Tools and Commodities Company, and Surplus Tools and Commodities, Inc., a Colorado corporation, Plaintiffs in Error, v. The CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a Colorado Municipal corporation, and Anthony Jansen, its Zoning Administrator, Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

February 28, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cole & Maley, a Professional Company, Robert A. Schiff, Denver, for plaintiffs in error.

Max P. Zall, City Atty., Earl T. Thrasher and Robert M. Kelly, Asst. City Attys., Denver, for defendants in error.

MOORE, Justice.

We refer to plaintiffs in error as the plaintiffs or by name, and to defendants in error as the defendants or Denver.

Plaintiffs Hale and Cox are the owners of Lots 42 and 46, Block 13, Valverde, in the City and County of Denver which they purchased in January of 1956. They erected thereon a store building, setting the front of it back from the lot line a distance of about six feet. Plaintiff Surplus Tools and Commodities, Inc. is a Colorado...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases