MOE v. STEENBERG

No. 40140-1.

147 N.W.2d 587 (1966)

Harriette MOE and Allen Moe, Appellants, v. Paul STEENBERG, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

December 30, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bonner, Bonner & Clements, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Clifford G. Nelson, Minneapolis, for respondent.


OPINION

OTIS, Justice.

Plaintiff seeks damages for injuries she sustained when defendant collided with her while ice skating. The jury returned a verdict for defendant and plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion for a new trial. The issue is whether the trial court erred in submitting the defense of assumption of risk.

Plaintiff's injury occurred on the evening of New Year's Day 1962 when she and her family were skating with defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases