1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 29 Wis.2d
  5. 29 Wis.2d 702 (1966)
 

HEIN v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

29 Wis.2d 702 (1966)

HEIN, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 1, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Arthur DeBardeleben of Park Falls.

For the respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company there was a brief and oral argument by Donald G. Olson of Phillips.

WILKIE, J.

Two issues are raised by this appeal:

First, did the trial court err in granting the insurer's motion for summary judgment?

Second, if not, did the trial court err in allowing the taxation of attorney's fees in favor of the insurer?

Summary Judgment.

State Farm is not entitled to summary judgment unless the facts presented conclusively show that the plaintiff's action has...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases