STATE v. LUDWIG


31 Wis.2d 690 (1966)

STATE, Respondent, v. LUDWIG, Agent for Ludwig Lanes, Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

July 1, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Joseph A. Van Susteren of Appleton.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and William A. Platz, assistant attorney general.


BEILFUSS, J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the statutory exemption of bowling alleys applies to the stipulated facts of this case so as to allow minors to frequent the barroom in question.

We are thus presented a question of law, as was the trial court.

It is the defendant's position that so long as her establishment contains bowling alleys the entire premises are covered by the bowling alley exemption in the statute. In fact, the stipulation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases