1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 371 F.2d
  5. 371 F.2d 347 (1966)
 

INTERNATIONAL TYPOGRAPHICAL U., AFL-CIO v. N. L. R. B.

Nos. 20012, 20105.

371 F.2d 347 (1966)

INTERNATIONAL TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Dixie Color Printing Corporation, Intervenor. DIXIE COLOR PRINTING CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, International Typographical Union, AFL-CIO, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided December 8, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. George Kaufmann, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 20,012 and intervenor in No. 20,105.

Mr. Marion A. Prowell, Atlanta, Ga., with whom Mr. Fred Elarbee, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 20,105 and intervenor in No. 20,012. Mr. Stanley R. Strauss, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for petitioner in No. 20,105 and intervenor in No. 20,012.

Mr. Robert G. Sewell, Atty., N. L. R. B., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Solomon I. Hirsh, Atty., N. L. R. B., were on the brief, for respondent.

Before BASTIAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and McGOWAN and ROBINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The petitioning union in No. 20,012 complains of the failure of the National Labor Relations Board to find the employer guilty of an unfair labor practice under Section 8(a) (3) of the Act. 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. The petitioning employer in No. 20,105 complains of the Board's determinations that it has violated Section 8(a) (1) and (5); and in this latter case the Board has cross-petitioned for enforcement. Neither review

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases