1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 147 S.E.2d
  5. 147 S.E.2d 566 (1966)
 

APEL v. QUEEN CITY COACH COMPANY

No. 279.

147 S.E.2d 566 (1966)

267 N.C. 25

Richard F. APEL v. QUEEN CITY COACH COMPANY, a corporation, d/b/a Queen City Trailways, and Frank Vernon White.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 13, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Haynes, Graham, Bernstein & Baucom, by William E. Graham, Jr., Charlotte, for plaintiff appellee.

Charles T. Myers, John F. Ray, Charlotte, for defendants appellants.

HIGGINS, Justice.

The defendants made timely motions to nonsuit and to set aside the verdict as being contrary to the greater weight of the evidence. These motions involved the same legal questions. Martin v. Underhill, 265 N.C. 669, 144 S.E.2d 872. They were properly denied. In fact, neither in their brief nor on the oral argument do the defendants seriously...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases