Judgment and order reversed, without costs, and motion for summary judgment denied.
In our opinion, issues of fact are presented as to whether the order for the tar, given by the town's Superintendent of Highways (the codefendant), was invalid in that it would result in an expenditure of money in excess of budget appropriations; whether the tar was ordered as the result of an emergency; and whether, under all of the facts presented,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.