GRADINJAN v. BOHO


29 Wis.2d 674 (1966)

GRADINJAN, Respondent, v. BOHO, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 1, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by O'Melia & Kaye of Rhinelander, and oral argument by Walter F. Kaye.

For the respondent there was a brief by Nikolay, Jensen & Scott of Colby, and oral argument by John J. Nikolay.


BEILFUSS, J.

The issues presented in this appeal are:

1. Did the respondent, Gradinjan, properly and timely appeal to the circuit court?

2. Were the three questioned ballots absentee ballots?

3. Is the provision of sec. 11.62, Stats., that absentee ballots not containing the name or initials of the issuing municipal clerk shall not be accepted or counted mandatory rather than directory?

Sec...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases