NIKITIUK v. PISHTEY


153 Conn. 545 (1966)

TUPCHY M. F. NIKITIUK ET AL. v. JOSEPH J. PISHTEY, ADMINISTRATOR C.T.A. (ESTATE OF FRED K. NIKITENKO), ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided April 5, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl D. Eisenman, assistant attorney general, with whom were F. Michael Ahern, assistant attorney general, and, on the brief, Harold M. Mulvey, attorney general, for the appellant (defendant state treasurer).

Thomas J. Condon, with whom, on the brief, was Edward J. Donahue, for the appellant (named defendant).

William L. Hadden and David B. Salzman, with whom was Herman M. Levy, for the appellees (plaintiffs).

KING, C. J., MURPHY, ALCORN, SHANNON and HOUSE, JS.


HOUSE, J.

This appeal is from a judgment of the Superior Court sustaining an appeal from a decree of the Probate Court for the district of Derby. There is no dispute as to the facts relevant to the appeal. The appellees, whom we will hereinafter refer to as the plaintiffs, are two brothers and a niece of Fred K. Nikitenko, whose estate was settled in the Derby Probate Court. By its decree dated December 15, 1959, that court determined that the plaintiffs were the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases