1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 361 F.2d
  5. 361 F.2d 332 (1966)
 

CORDLE v. RENAULT, INC.

Nos. 16509, 16510.

361 F.2d 332 (1966)

Daniel C. CORDLE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RENAULT, INC., Defendant-Appellant. Daniel C. CORDLE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. B. B. BURCHAM, doing business as Burcham Motors, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

May 31, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Carriger, Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellant, Renault, Strang, Fletcher, Carriger & Walker, Chattanooga, Tenn., on the brief.

Paul Campbell, Jr., Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellant B. B. Burcham, Campbell & Campbell, Chattanooga, Tenn., on the brief.

S. Richard Holcomb, and Walter L. Lusk, Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellee, Walter S. Lusk, S. Richard Holcomb, Lusk & Holcomb, Chattanooga, Tenn., on the brief.

Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is a products liability case. The dealer and manufacturer of a Renault automobile were held liable to the purchaser for personal injuries and property damage. The cause of the damage was alleged to be a defect or defects in the automobile. This car went out of control on the highway and turned over, allegedly as the result of vibration.

Jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship. Tennessee law is controlling.

The complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases